Constitutional Law

Due Process

Due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments has two components: procedural due process (fair procedures before deprivation) and substantive due process (protection of fundamental rights).

Overview

Due process is one of the most important concepts in constitutional law, appearing in both the Fifth Amendment (limiting the federal government) and the Fourteenth Amendment (limiting state governments). It has two distinct components: procedural due process and substantive due process.

Procedural due process requires that the government provide fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. The threshold question is whether a protected interest exists — property interests typically arise from existing rules or understandings, while liberty interests include both physical freedom and other protected interests. Once a protected interest is identified, the court applies the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test, weighing: (1) the private interest affected; (2) the risk of erroneous deprivation and the value of additional safeguards; and (3) the government's interest, including the administrative burden.

Substantive due process protects fundamental rights from government interference regardless of the procedures used. When a fundamental right is at stake, courts apply strict scrutiny — the government must show the law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest. Fundamental rights include the right to marry (Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges), the right to privacy and bodily autonomy (Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut), the right to raise children (Troxel v. Granville), and the right to intimate association (Lawrence v. Texas).

The Lochner era represents a cautionary tale about substantive due process: the Court struck down economic regulations as violating "liberty of contract," a period now viewed as improperly substituting judicial policy preferences for legislative choices.

Key Takeaway

Due process has two faces: procedural (fair process before deprivation) and substantive (protection of fundamental rights from government interference regardless of procedure).

Exam Tip

Always separate procedural from substantive due process analysis. For procedural, use Mathews v. Eldridge's three-part balancing test. For substantive, first determine if a fundamental right is at issue — this determines the level of scrutiny.

Landmark Cases (11)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Mathews v. Eldridge test?

The three-part balancing test for procedural due process weighs: (1) the private interest at stake, (2) the risk of erroneous deprivation and value of additional safeguards, and (3) the government's interest including the fiscal and administrative burden of additional procedures.

What rights are protected by substantive due process?

Fundamental rights protected include: marriage, contraception, family integrity, child-rearing, bodily autonomy, intimate sexual conduct, and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment. Economic liberties receive only rational basis review after the Lochner era.

What is the difference between procedural and substantive due process?

Procedural due process asks: did the government follow fair procedures before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property? Substantive due process asks: does the government have the power to take this action at all, regardless of the procedures used?

Master Due Process with Briefly

AI-powered tools built for law students. Generate case briefs, practice cold calls, and ace your constitutional law exam.