All Federal Rules of Evidence

Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs

Rule 1006: Summaries to Prove Content

Quick Answer

What is Summaries to Prove Content?

Rule 1006 provides a practical solution for cases involving massive quantities of documents, records, or data that would be impossible for a jury to review individually. Rather than having the jury sift through thousands of pages of bank records or years of business transactions, the proponent can present a summary, chart, or calculation that distills the key information.

Source: Fed. R. Evid. 1006

Rule Text

The proponent may use a summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court. The proponent must make the originals or duplicates available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. The court may order the proponent to produce them in court.

Plain English Explanation

Rule 1006 provides a practical solution for cases involving massive quantities of documents, records, or data that would be impossible for a jury to review individually. Rather than having the jury sift through thousands of pages of bank records or years of business transactions, the proponent can present a summary, chart, or calculation that distills the key information.

The summary itself becomes the evidence — it is admitted as a substitute for the underlying voluminous materials. This distinguishes Rule 1006 summaries from pedagogical aids or demonstrative exhibits, which are used only to help explain testimony and are not themselves evidence. The distinction matters because 1006 summaries go to the jury room; demonstrative aids typically do not.

The safeguard is that the underlying originals or duplicates must be made available to the opposing party for examination and copying at a reasonable time and place. This allows the opponent to verify the accuracy of the summary, challenge it, and prepare cross-examination. The court can also order the underlying documents to be produced in court. The proponent bears the burden of ensuring the summary accurately represents the voluminous materials.

Key Points

  • 1Summaries, charts, and calculations can substitute for voluminous originals that are impractical to examine in court
  • 2The summary itself is admitted as evidence — not just a demonstrative aid
  • 3The underlying originals or duplicates must be made available to the opposing party for review
  • 4The proponent must ensure the summary accurately represents the underlying materials
  • 5Distinguish from demonstrative aids used to illustrate testimony — 1006 summaries are substantive evidence

Common Exam Issues

  • Distinguishing Rule 1006 summaries (substantive evidence) from demonstrative summaries (not evidence, just illustrative aids)
  • Whether the underlying materials are truly too voluminous to be conveniently examined in court
  • Whether the opposing party was given adequate access to the underlying materials to verify the summary

Landmark Cases

  • United States v. Draiman
  • Bray v. Bi-State Development Corp.

Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs

This rule is part of Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Browse All FRE Rules

Master Evidence Law with AI-Powered Study Tools

20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.

Start Free Trial