Public Service

Judicial Clerkship

Judicial clerks work directly for federal or state judges, researching legal issues, drafting opinions, and gaining an inside view of how courts make decisions. It is a one-to-two year position that is widely considered the single best credential a young lawyer can have, opening doors to virtually every subsequent career path.

Quick Facts

Salary Range

$65,000 - $115,000

Median: $80,000

Work-Life Balance

Average

Category

Public Service

Overview

A judicial clerkship is a temporary position — typically one or two years — in which a recent law school graduate works as a judge's primary legal advisor and writing assistant. Clerks research the legal issues presented in cases before the court, draft bench memoranda analyzing the arguments, discuss cases with the judge, and draft judicial opinions. It is an apprenticeship in the most literal sense: you work at the elbow of an experienced jurist, observing and participating in the decision-making process at the highest level.

Clerkships exist at every level of the judiciary, and the prestige and competitiveness vary accordingly. Federal appellate clerkships (Courts of Appeals) and Supreme Court clerkships are the most coveted positions in the legal profession. Federal district court clerkships are highly competitive and provide excellent litigation training. State supreme court and appellate clerkships are also valuable, particularly for those who intend to practice in that state. Even state trial court clerkships provide meaningful experience and a credential that distinguishes candidates in the job market.

The educational value of a clerkship is difficult to overstate. You see cases from the judge's perspective, understanding how arguments land, what makes a brief persuasive, and how judicial decision-making actually works behind closed doors. You become a dramatically better legal writer and thinker. You build a relationship with your judge that typically lasts a lifetime — judges take deep pride in their clerks' subsequent careers and serve as mentors, references, and advocates for decades.

Clerkships are also a gateway credential. Federal appellate clerks can essentially choose their subsequent career: BigLaw firms pay substantial clerkship bonuses (often $75,000 to $100,000+), government agencies and public interest organizations actively recruit former clerks, and academia strongly prefers candidates with clerkship experience. The one-to-two year investment pays dividends throughout an entire career.

A Day in the Life

A federal appellate clerk's day typically begins around 8:30 or 9:00 AM in chambers. The judge has a panel sitting next week, and the clerk is responsible for three of the cases on the calendar. She spends the morning finishing a bench memorandum on a complex habeas corpus petition, analyzing the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel against the Strickland standard and the AEDPA's deferential standard of review. The memo runs fifteen to twenty pages, summarizing the facts, the lower court's reasoning, each party's arguments, and her recommended disposition.

After a brief meeting with the judge to discuss the memo — the judge pushes back on one of her conclusions, and they debate the issue for twenty minutes before the judge asks her to research an additional precedent — she turns to a second case involving a statutory interpretation question under the Clean Air Act. She pulls the relevant legislative history and reads three circuit court opinions that have addressed the issue.

In the afternoon, she begins drafting an opinion in a case that was argued two weeks ago. The judge has decided the outcome and given her broad direction on the reasoning. She drafts the factual background and the standard of review sections, knowing the analysis section will require several rounds of revision with the judge. She leaves around 6:30 PM. The work is intellectually intense but the hours are reasonable — typically fifty to fifty-five hours per week, with occasional longer stretches around argument sessions.

Typical Career Path

  1. Law school with strong academic performance (top 10-15% for federal clerkships, with law review or journal membership strongly preferred)

  2. Apply for clerkships through OSCAR (federal) or directly to state courts, typically during 2L or 3L year

  3. One-to-two year clerkship at the trial or appellate level

  4. Optional: second clerkship at a higher court (e.g., district court clerk applies for appellate clerkship)

  5. Transition to BigLaw (with substantial signing bonus), government, public interest, or academia

  6. Some clerks pursue Supreme Court clerkships, which require a feeder judge recommendation and are the most competitive legal positions in the country

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Unparalleled legal education — you become a dramatically better writer, researcher, and analytical thinker in a compressed timeframe
  • Lifetime mentorship relationship with your judge, who serves as a reference and advocate throughout your career
  • The single most versatile credential in law — a federal clerkship opens doors to BigLaw, government, academia, and every other path
  • Substantial clerkship bonuses from law firms ($75,000 to $100,000+) and preferential hiring across the legal market
  • Inside understanding of judicial decision-making that makes you a more effective advocate for the rest of your career

Cons

  • Temporary position (one to two years) that requires planning your next career move while clerking
  • Modest salary during the clerkship year, which can be difficult for graduates with heavy loan burdens
  • The application process is stressful, opaque, and highly competitive, with timing that can conflict with other job searches
  • Geographic constraints — you must relocate to wherever your judge sits, which may be a city you would not otherwise choose
  • The experience varies enormously depending on the judge: some are brilliant mentors, others are difficult personalities who make the year unpleasant

Key Skills

Exceptional legal research skills across multiple areas of lawLegal writing at the highest level, with ability to write clearly and precisely under time constraintsAnalytical reasoning and ability to see both sides of complex legal argumentsDiscretion and confidentiality regarding the deliberative processEfficiency and time management with multiple cases at different stages simultaneouslyInterpersonal skills to work closely with a judge and co-clerks in a small officeIntellectual humility and willingness to be challenged on your analysis

Relevant Law School Courses

Federal Courts / Federal Jurisdiction
Constitutional Law (advanced seminar)
Civil Procedure (advanced)
Evidence
Appellate Advocacy / Appellate Practice
Legal writing courses and independent writing projects

Top Employers

U.S. Supreme Court (9 justices, ~36 clerk positions per year)
U.S. Courts of Appeals (13 circuits, ~180 judges)
U.S. District Courts (94 districts, ~670 authorized judgeships)
U.S. Bankruptcy Courts
State supreme courts and appellate courts
Specialized federal courts (Court of Federal Claims, Tax Court, Court of International Trade)

Advice from Practitioners

Your relationship with your judge is everything. Choose a judge whose temperament, intellectual style, and values align with yours. A clerkship with a respectful, engaged judge at a lower court is infinitely better than a clerkship with a difficult judge on a more prestigious court. Ask former clerks honest questions before accepting.

Use the clerkship to explore. You will see cases across every area of law — pay attention to what excites you intellectually. Many clerks discover their practice area interest during the clerkship, not before it.

Write every day and treat every memo and opinion draft as if it will be published under your name. The writing skills you develop during a clerkship compound for the rest of your career, but only if you push yourself to improve with each draft.

Apply broadly. The clerkship market is unpredictable, and many of the best clerkship experiences are with judges whose names you do not yet know. A brilliant, generous judge on a district court in a smaller city can provide a better experience than a famous appellate judge who barely speaks to clerks.