192 U.S. 585 (1904)
Adams v. New York is a significant case in the realm of search and seizure jurisprudence in the United States, particularly concerning the scope of the Fourth Amendment.
Can evidence obtained during the execution of a lawful search warrant, though not specified in the warrant, be admitted in a criminal trial?
Evidence seized during the execution of a lawful search warrant may be admissible even if it was not specified in the warrant, so long as the initial search is valid under the Fourth Amendment.
The Supreme Court held that the evidence obtained, though not listed in the warrant, did not violate the Fourth Amendment because it was discovered during a lawful search.
Adams v. New York is significant because it established an early precedent in search and seizure jurisprudence that influenced the evolution of related doctrines. It framed the discussion around what is considered reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and set the stage for later important cases like Terry v. Ohio. This case is crucial for law students examining the historical foundation of American search and seizure laws and understanding how these principles have evolved to balance personal privacy with law enforcement needs.