Fisher v. University of Texas — Quick Summary

Fisher v. University of Texas

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

In Brief

Fisher v. University of Texas is a landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with the complex issue of affirmative action in university admissions.

Key Issue

Does the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in its admissions process violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

The Rule

Under the Equal Protection Clause, government programs that classify individuals based on race must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest and can only survive if they pass strict scrutiny.

Bottom Line

The Supreme Court held that the University of Texas at Austin’s consideration of race as part of a holistic admissions process met the strict scrutiny standard and was constitutional.

Why It Matters

Fisher v. University of Texas is significant as it reaffirms the principles set forth in prior affirmative action cases such as Grutter v. Bollinger. It clarifies the application of strict scrutiny to race-conscious admissions policies and serves as a guide for universities seeking to implement similar policies. For law students, this case is a cornerstone for understanding affirmative action's constitutional dimensions and provides insight into judicial reasoning about equal protection.

Master More Constitutional Law Cases with Briefly

Get AI-powered case briefs, practice questions, and study tools to excel in your law studies.