458 U.S. 718 (1982)
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly impacted gender discrimination jurisprudence.
Does the exclusion of males from a state-sponsored nursing school violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Under the Equal Protection Clause, classifications by gender must serve important governmental objectives and must be substantially related to the achievement of those objectives (intermediate scrutiny).
The Supreme Court held that MUW's female-only admission policy was unconstitutional. The exclusion of men in this context did not substantially further an important governmental objective.
The case is significant in the realm of constitutional law for underscoring how courts assess gender-based classifications. It clarified the application of intermediate scrutiny, ensuring that gender-specific laws must have a strong, evidence-based justification. Law students study this case to understand the nuances of applying constitutional standards to gender discrimination and the evolving legal landscape for equal protection under the law.