NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. — Quick Summary

NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.

NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938)

In Brief

The case of NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.

Key Issue

Can an employer hire permanent replacement workers to continue its operations during an economic strike without engaging in an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act?

The Rule

Under the National Labor Relations Act, employers are permitted to hire replacement workers during an economic strike; however, they may not undertake actions that discriminate against union activities or improperly refuse reinstatement to striking employees without legal justification.

Bottom Line

The Supreme Court held that while an employer may hire permanent replacement workers during an economic strike, it cannot discriminate against union activities by refusing to reinstate striking workers post-strike if its actions are motivated by anti-union bias.

Why It Matters

NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. is significant for its articulation of the lawful actions employers may take during an economic strike and the limitations imposed to protect workers' rights to organize and engage in collective bargaining. This case is foundational for labor law students, highlighting the balance between employment management and employee rights under federal law.

Master More Administrative Law Cases with Briefly

Get AI-powered case briefs, practice questions, and study tools to excel in your law studies.