U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton — Quick Summary

U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton

514 U.S. 779 (1995)

In Brief

U.S. Term Limits, Inc.

Key Issue

Can a state impose additional qualifications for U.S. Congress members beyond those specified in the U.S. Constitution?

The Rule

The Qualifications Clauses in Article I, Sections 2 and 3 of the U.S. Constitution set the exclusive requirements for members of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, and states cannot add to these qualifications.

Bottom Line

No, states cannot impose additional qualifications for U.S. Congress members beyond what is outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Why It Matters

U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton is crucial for understanding the principle of national supremacy over state law within the federal system. It reaffirms that the structure and function of the federal government, including the qualifications for members of Congress, are governed by the national Constitution rather than by individual state constitutions. The decision preserves the uniformity and consistency intended in the legislative branch's operation as established by the Framers, emphasizing the priority of federal law in governing national offices.

Master More Constitutional Law Cases with Briefly

Get AI-powered case briefs, practice questions, and study tools to excel in your law studies.